about lcc film music
 
MUSIC SCORING SOFTWARE: SIBELIUS vs FINALE
by Mike Collins
Many Jazz or Film scores are still copied by hand, but there are two serious professional music scoring software packages which both claim to provide all the features you will need for jazz or orchestral music. Finale has been around the longest and is available for Mac and PC, while Sibelius, which was originally only available on the Archimedes computer, has recently become available for both Mac and PC.

Finale has an excellent Jazz font which you can use to give your music ahandwritten look. It also includes a great variety of jazz articulations, chords and dynamics, percussion notation and other specialized text items. A Jazz Band template is provided already laid out for brass instruments plus guitar, piano, bass and drums rhythm section. Sibelius also has a font called Inkpen which simulates neatly handwritten music and the range of notation symbols appears to be almost as comprehensive. Sibelius offers a Big Band template just like Finale's Jazz Band, and also has an R & B Band template, with 2 guitars, bass, drums, keyboards, vocal and 4 brass instruments, and a Jazz Quartet with alto sax, piano, bass and drums.

For a professional's opinion, I called jazz and big band trumpeter and arranger Mark Cumberland who does lots of copying of big and small band arrangements in a jazz style for the BBC Big Band and NYJO. Mark commented "I have used Sibelius since its inception but I am also learning Finale to make sure that I have both of the most popular packages under my belt. In Sibelius I particularly like the way you can hear back what you are doing as you develop the arrangement. And when you are copying it the ability to
hear what you are doing adds a further level of proofing. By the time you get to the studio you can feel much more confident that there aren't any wrong notes." But can it compete with hand-copying? "As it happens, the job I did last week was one of the first pieces on which I felt it was quicker working with the software than writing by hand. This was a minimalist string ensemble piece with lots of repetition - so the copy and past
features really saved time."

I recently transcribed a solo jazz guitar arrangement of the well-known Irish tune "Danny Boy" as performed by Jim Mullen. Having written this out roughly by hand, I decided that it would be worth printing a few copies out to give to friends - and to Jim himself. So which would be faster and which would deliver the best result - Finale or Sibelius? For me, Finale had the advantage, as I have used this, albeit somewhat occasionally, for a number
of years now. Sibelius, on the other hand, was a completely new software package for me to learn.

I decided that I would like to create tablature alongside the conventional music notation, and to enter chord symbols and guitar fretboard diagrams as well. Although I read and write music reasonably well these days, I am nowhere near as fast or as fluent as I would like to be - probably as I am a (mostly) self-taught guitarist who (mostly) plays improvised blues and jazz music - and Tab, diagrams and chord symbols can often make the music more accessible for me.
 

click on Finale screen picture to enlarge it
So, I started out with Finale, and using just one voice/layer I got the 34 bars of music entered using the mouse and keyboard in one reasonably speedy 3-hour session -complete with chord symbols. Then I tried Sibelius. This took three sessions to get the music completely sorted out - with Tab, chord symbols and fretboard diagrams this time. I put a couple of calls in to Sibelius' excellent Technical Support team, and spoke to two people who were incredibly helpful. The first guy got me quickly set up to enter the
music into four different voices and create the Tab from this. The second person, despite being new to the job, was also extremely helpful. What really made the difference was the fact that they were both extremely musically-literate - so I sang some notes down the phone and they quickly suggested the best way notate these!

 
click on Sibelius screen picture to enlarge it
Once the music was looking good in Sibelius, I went back to Finale and spent a further three sessions re-entering the music using four different voices/layers as in Sibelius, creating the chord symbols and guitar Tab, and attempting to create the guitar fretboard diagrams. Finale proved to be much slower than Sibelius, especially when it came to producing the guitar Tab. In Finale, you have to highlight the notes in a measure using the Note Mover tool, then drag these notes - often individually, or at best simultaneously moving all the notes within a bar to be played on one particular string - to the tablature stave. Creating guitar tablature in Sibelius is much faster. You just click on a measure and drag it to the guitar tab stave and the software works out which frets and strings to put
the notes on. Then if you want to use different frets/strings, you just drag notes to the strings you want them to be played on. Also, I could not find any quick way to create the correct guitar fretboard diagrams in Finale. Finale insisted on putting up straight-ahead major or minor chord forms in the lowest available positions and offered no way to easily edit these. Sibelius, on the other hand, let me create a fretboard diagram wherever I wished and it would present various alternative fingerings of a wide range of chords to choose from (see screenshot). It was easy to customise these by dragging the dots on the frets to a different position - and I did need to customise many chords, as those played in the piece often employed unusual fingerings.
On the positive side, Finale automatically corrected the note names I chose for the chord symbols to the correct choices for the key I was in. For example, Ab was renamed to G# as I was working in the 'sharp' key of E major. Sibelius let me keep my mistakes. Unfortunately, Finale's in-built rules about how to name chords also got in my way - especially when I wanted to name a chord in an unusual way to indicate that it had the 6, 9
and 11 notes of the scale in the chord. Sibelius let me type 6/9/11 without objecting, while Finale just wouldn't let me write this under any circumstances! The next problem I had to contend with was the positioning of the notes and stems onscreen. Again, it was pretty easy to instruct Sibelius to move the notes of a chord (which I had entered as 3 or 4
voices/layers) apart for clarity rather than lining them up vertically. This is probably possible in Finale but I could not find out how to do it in the time I had allotted. The final 'proof of the pudding' came when I printed out what I had managed to achieve in my three evenings spent with each scorewriter. The score prepared with Sibelius won 'hands-down' (see
screenshots).
Quotes:

Daniel Biry says "Finale is for people printing music - Sibelius is for
composers!"

Well-known composer Lalo Schifrin says, "Sibelius is exceptionally
fast and easy to use, and its printed output looks absolutely beautiful. At
last, this is the first music notation program I can actually use!"


Mike Collins © 2000
Email Mike: 100271.2175@compuserve.com
 
Sibelius 2.0 :

Sibelius Software Ltd
75 Burleigh St,
Cambridge CB1 1DJ
Tel: 01223 302765
Fax: 01223 351947
Web site: www.sibelius.com

Finale 2000:

UK Distribution: Et Cetera
Tel: 01706 228039
Fax: 01706 222989.

Publisher: Coda Music Technology
6210 Bury Drive
Eden Prairie

MN 55346-1718

USA

Tel: 001 612 937 9611
Fax: 001 612 937 9760
Web site: www.codamusic.com

5.1 FOR FILM COMPOSERS (Surround Sound)
 

email lcc -  Web master : Dan Biry - © lcc film music 1999-2004